From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

HOW SHOULD SEVERE ASYMPTOMATIC HYPERTENSION BE TREATED.

When asymptomatic persons with severe hypertension are seen in the emergency room, they are often medicated aggressively, despite the lack of data supporting such treatment. This practice may represent an emotional response by physicians who rarely encounter marked elevations in blood pressure.

To determine whether acute antihypertensive loading improves short-term control of blood pressure, these authors studied 74 asymptomatic patients with diastolic pressure between 116 and 139 mm Hg who presented to the emergency department. No patient had evidence of malignant hypertension. After receiving clonidine (0.2 mg) and chlorthalidone (25 mg), patients were randomized to one of three regimens: hourly doses of clonidine (up to four) until diastolic pressure fell by 20 points or below 105 mm Hg; four hourly doses of placebo; or immediate discharge. All patients were discharged on maintenance therapy of 0.2 mg clonidine and 50 mg chlorthalidone per day and were reexamined during the following week.

There was no difference between the first two groups in mean diastolic pressure at the time of discharge. Moreover, the mean blood pressure was similar in all three groups at 24 hours and one week after discharge. These results indicate that acute antihypertensive loading with multiple doses is not likely to improve short-term control of blood pressure. Since rapid lowering of blood pressure may occasionally cause symptomatic hypotension without conferring benefits, this practice should probably be abandoned for asymptomatic persons.

— ASB

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine October 24, 1989

Citation(s):

Zeller KR et al. Rapid reduction of severe asymptomatic hypertension: a prospective controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 1989 Oct 149 2186-2189.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1989. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.