From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

FORECASTING THE FUTURE OF AIDS.

Although the number of new AIDS cases continues to increase each year, some signs suggest that the epidemic may have peaked in certain groups. The difficulty of using this information to predict the future of the AIDS epidemic -- and thus to plan for health-care needs -- is reflected in a series of recent articles in JAMA.

Lemp and colleagues describe a model that predicts the expected morbidity and mortality from AIDS in San Francisco. The model uses data on seroconversion rates for homosexual and bisexual men and intravenous drug abusers, assuming a median incubation period for AIDS among infected persons of 11 years and a median survival after diagnosis of 14.4 months. These authors concluded that annual mortality will continue to rise, reaching 1388 to 2478 deaths per year in 1993 in San Francisco alone.

In contrast, Bregman and Langmuir examined the AIDS epidemic using Farr's Law, which dictates that in large epidemics the incidence of cases tends to rise and then fall in the shape of a normal curve. Their analysis indicates that the incidence of AIDS peaked in late 1988 and will decline to a low point by the mid-1990s.

In an accompanying editorial, Morgan questions whether Farr's Law is appropriate for HIV, which infects subsets of people in different ways at different rates, and suggests that Bregman and Langmuir may be underestimating the cumulative number of AIDS cases to come.

— THL

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine March 20, 1990

Citation(s):

Morgan M et al. The future course of AIDS in the United States. JAMA 1990 Mar 16 263 1539-1540.

Bregman DJ; Langmuir AD. Farr's Law applied to AIDS projections. JAMA 1990 Mar 16 263 1522-1525.

Lemp GF et al. Projections of AIDS morbidity and mortality in San Francisco. JAMA 1990 Mar 16 263 1497-1501.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1990. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.