From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

CHEST X-RAYS ARE OFTEN UNNECESSARY IN FEBRILE NEONATES.

Febrile neonates often receive an extensive work-up to diagnose the cause of their fever. A chest x-ray is commonly included, but is it necessary when the infant has no evidence of pulmonary disease? This study compared clinical and x-ray findings in 242 febrile infants less than 8 weeks of age who were seen at the Bronx Municipal Hospital Center over a 3-year period. Technically adequate chest x-rays were obtained for 228 infants; 201 (88 percent) were negative. Respiratory signs (cough, tachypnea, rales, retractions, rhonchi, and rhinorrhea) were significantly correlated with a positive chest x-ray: x-rays were positive in 25 (31 percent) of the 80 neonates with at least one respiratory sign, but in only 2 (1 percent) of 148 babies without respiratory signs. Wheezing was the only respiratory sign not associated with a positive x-ray. The more respiratory signs present, the greater the likelihood of a positive x-ray: only 9 percent of babies with a single sign had a positive x-ray, versus 74 percent of those with three or more signs.

Because 99 percent of the febrile neonates without signs or symptoms of pulmonary disease had normal chest x-rays, the authors conclude that routine chest x-rays are unnecessary in such patients.

— RAD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine October 29, 1991

Citation(s):

Crain EF et al. Is a chest radiograph necessary in the evaluation of every febrile infant less than 8 weeks of age. Pediatrics 1991 Oct 88 821-824.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1991. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.