From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

THE DIM PROGNOSIS OF FAILED PREHOSPITAL CPR.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is often practiced when the chance of success is low (see Journal Watch accession number 910625007), such as when the initial rhythm is electromechanical dissociation or asystole, or continued when initial CPR has been unsuccessful for 15 minutes or more. Such prolonged use of CPR is increasingly being challenged.

A team from Rhode Island Hospital studied the records of 185 patients who continued to receive CPR in the emergency department after prehospital CPR by rescue personnel had been unsuccessful. By the time patients reached the emergency department, electromechanical dissociation and asystole were the primary cardiac rhythms noted. Emergency- department CPR was successful in 16 patients (9 percent), who then were admitted to the hospital. Their mean resuscitation time was 19 minutes.

Despite successful resuscitation in the emergency department, none of the patients were discharged alive. All remained comatose during the last hours of their lives, except for one patient who regained consciousness but remained intubated. The mean lengths of stay in the intensive-care unit and in the hospital were 2.3 days and 12.6 days, respectively, and charges averaged $11,307 per patient. The authors and an editorialist conclude that it is generally both inhumane and wasteful to continue resuscitating a victim of cardiac arrest when prehospital resuscitation has failed.

— ALK

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine November 19, 1991

Citation(s):

Weaver WD. Resuscitation outside the hospital -- what's lacking. N Engl J Med 1991 Nov 14 325 1437-1439.

Gray WA et al. Unsuccessful emergency medical resuscitation -- are continued efforts in the emergency department justified. N Engl J Med 1991 Nov 14 325 1393-1398.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1991. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.