From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

FAVORABLE RESULTS WITH LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY.

An AMA panel recently gave a favorable review for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the latest innovation in the surgical treatment of gallbladder disease (see JW accession number 910402005). Now a large case series supports the panel's conclusions.

Over 1500 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed by 59 surgeons with no contractual ties to instrument manufacturers. In 5 percent of cases, factors such as inflammation or adhesions led to conversion to conventional open cholecystectomy during the procedure. Five percent of the patients had complications, including wound infection (1 percent), bile duct injury (0.5 percent), and retained common duct stones (0.4 percent). Complication rates were unrelated to the use of either laser dissection or cautery and were similar in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Only one patient died postoperatively (from a ruptured aortic aneurysm), and cardiopulmonary complications were virtually nil. The mean duration of hospitalization was 1.2 days.

These results provide reassurance that the rapidly expanding use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is justified. Complication rates compare favorably with those of conventional cholecystectomy, and the short hospital stay and rapid recuperation time are decided advantages of the new procedure.

— ASB

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine April 23, 1991

Citation(s):

The Southern Surgeons Club. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 1991 Apr 18 324 1073-1078.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1991. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.