From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

MI CAN BE RULED OUT WITHIN 12 HOURS IN SOME PATIENTS.

Most patients admitted to coronary care units for acute chest pain subsequently "rule out" for a myocardial infarction after an observation period of 24 to 48 hours. A new analysis of data from patients enrolled in the Multicenter Chest Pain Study suggests that some patients can be safely transferred out of the CCU after 12 hours.

The probability of MI at the time of admission to the emergency room was first determined in a group of 976 patients according to a published algorithm. Patients in whom the predicted probability of MI was low (less than 7 percent) had an even lower risk of MI if they had normal levels of cardiac enzymes and no recurrent ischemic pain during the first 12 hours of hospitalization. When these guidelines were applied to a new group of 2684 patients, 771 qualified as candidates for a 12-hour observation period. Of these patients, only four (0.5 percent) subsequently developed nonfatal MI, and three experienced fatal cardiac arrest, the deaths occurring 3 to 5 days after admission. Rates of other major cardiovascular complications were also low.

Because many patients who were eligible for early discharge under the study criteria actually remained in the CCU, it is possible that outcomes would not have been as good had early discharge been attempted. Nevertheless, this study provides useful data to guide clinicians in the early discharge of patients with a low probability of MI.

— ALK

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine May 3, 1991

Citation(s):

Eagle KA. Medical decision making in patients with chest pain. N Engl J Med 1991 May 2 324 1282-1283.

Lee TH et al. Ruling out myocardial infarction: a prospective multicenter validation of a 12-hour strategy for patients at low risk. N Engl J Med 1991 May 2 324 1239-1246.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1991. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.