From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

ENDARTERECTOMY HAS LITTLE VALUE IN ASYMPTOMATIC CAROTID STENOSIS.

Carotid endarterectomy is valuable in patients with symptomatic high-grade stenosis (see Journal Watch accession number 911224003). This large multicenter randomized trial from the Department of Veterans Affairs examined the procedure's value in 444 men with at least 50 percent stenosis on arteriography but no symptoms.

The patients averaged 64 years of age, and 87 percent were white. All received optimal medical management, including aspirin (650 mg twice daily), and half also underwent endarterectomy. During a mean follow-up of 48 months, the combined incidence of ipsilateral neurologic events (transient ischemic attack, transient monocular blindness, or stroke) differed significantly between the medical and surgical groups (21 percent vs. 8 percent). However, there were no significant differences in rates of ipsilateral stroke alone (9.4 percent vs. 4.7 percent), stroke or death combined (44 percent vs. 41 percent), or death or stroke within 30 days after randomization (1.3 percent vs. 4.7 percent).

Although the surgical patients had a lower risk of transient neurologic events, they had no reduction in death or permanent neurologic events, and nearly 5 percent suffered stroke or death within 30 days. An editorial concludes that carotid endarterectomy should have no place in the management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis until results are known from an ongoing, much larger randomized study of this question.

— ALK

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine January 29, 1993

Citation(s):

Barnett HJM; Haines SJ. Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1993 Jan 28 328 276-279.

Hobson RW et al. Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1993 Jan 28 328 221-227.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1993. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.