From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

SERIOUS GAPS IN CHILDHOOD IMMUNIZATION.

Two studies in a special issue of JAMA devoted to vaccines report serious gaps between recommended and actual immunization of U.S. infants.

The first study analyzed follow-up data for 7035 infants from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey. All infants were at least eight months old and living with their mothers; roughly half were white and half black. Only 46 percent of white infants and 34 percent of blacks had received adequate immunization by eight months of age. Children living in poverty were at high risk for inadequate immunization and an inadequate number of well-baby visits.

The second study interviewed mothers of healthy full-term newborns shortly after the birth and 9 to 12 months later at a large municipal teaching hospital. Most patients (86 percent) were insured by Medicaid. Despite the availability of free vaccine to most patients, only 29 percent of infants had up-to-date vaccinations at 7 months, including just 23 percent of infants from poor families. Poverty, unmarried status, and inadequate prenatal care all independently predicted incomplete immunization. Infants who lived with their grandmothers were almost twice as likely as those who did not to have complete immunizations. Comment: Both studies show that in some socioeconomic groups in the U.S., the majority of infants do not receive adequate vaccination. Because there seem to be barriers other than lack of health insurance, efforts to improve vaccination coverage should seek to remove nonfiscal barriers to care.

— TH Lee

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine October 25, 1994

Citation(s):

Bates AS et al. Risk factors for underimmunization in poor urban infants. JAMA 1994 Oct 12 272 1105-1110.

Mustin HD et al. infants born in 1988. JAMA 1994 Oct 12 272 1111-1115.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1994. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.