From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

ACE INHIBITORS FOR NONDIABETIC RENAL FAILURE.

Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors can slow the inevitable decline in renal function in diabetic patients, but can they do the same in nondiabetic renal disease? This multicenter, open, randomized trial in France compared ACE inhibitor therapy with standard beta-blocker therapy in 100 hypertensive, nondiabetic patients with chronic renal failure.

The patients' initial serum creatinine was 200 to 400 micromoles per liter (2.3 to 4.5 mg/dl); 52 received enalapril and 48 received beta-blockers. During three years of follow-up, 35 percent of the beta-blocker group developed end-stage renal failure, versus only 19 percent of the enalapril group. Three patients taking enalapril had to withdraw from the study because of side effects (hyperkalemia in two, cough in one). Patients with glomerular disease showed a significant fall in proteinuria at six months with enalapril as compared with beta-blockers, but this effect was less apparent thereafter. The two groups had similar blood-pressure control.

Comment: This study strongly suggests that ACE inhibition can delay renal deterioration more effectively than beta- blockers in nondiabetic patients with renal failure and hypertension. The mechanism of this effect is unknown, but probably is not related to blood-pressure control. Although we should further investigate the value of ACE inhibitors in different subgroups of patients with renal failure, it is reasonable to consider these drugs in patients with renal disease and hypertension.

— KI Marton

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine October 28, 1994

Citation(s):

Hannedouche T et al. Randomised controlled trial of enalapril and beta blockers in non-diabetic chronic renal failure. BMJ 1994 Oct 1 309 833-837.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1994. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.