From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

A NEW SCREENING STRATEGY FOR DOWN'S SYNDROME.

Pregnant women in the U.S. are generally offered amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling starting at age 35, when the risk of Down's syndrome roughly equals the risk of amniocentesis-related fetal loss. This study compared routine amniocentesis with a screening strategy using maternal serum markers to estimate the risk of Down's syndrome.

About 5400 pregnant women aged 35 years or older underwent amniocentesis and three serum tests (alpha-fetoprotein, unconjugated estriol, and human chorionic gonadotropin). There were 54 cases of Down's syndrome diagnosed by amniocentesis.

When the cutoffs for abnormal serum tests were adjusted to correspond with a risk of 1 in 200, the serum markers identified 89 percent of Down's cases with a 25 percent false positive rate. If only the women with "abnormal" serum tests had received amniocentesis, 48 of the 54 Down's cases would have been identified, 75 percent of the 5400 women would have avoided amniocentesis, and there would have been about 20 fewer amniocentesis-related miscarriages.

Comment: This study clearly shows that screening with serum testing could markedly reduce amniocentesis, at the price of missing a small number of Down's cases. But as two editorialists point out, the acceptance of this strategy depends on patients' values and assumes that 35 is the appropriate age to start screening.

— AS Brett

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine April 29, 1994

Citation(s):

Pauker SP; Pauker SG. Prenatal diagnosis--why is 35 a magic number. N Engl J Med 1994 Apr 21 330 1151-1152.

Haddow JE et al. Reducing the need for amniocentesis in women 35 years of age or older with serum markers for screening. N Engl J Med 1994 Apr 21 330 1114-1118.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1994. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.