From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

NONINVASIVE VENTILATION REDUCES NEED FOR INTUBATION.

There is growing evidence that noninvasive ventilation may reduce the need for endotracheal intubation in some patients with respiratory failure. This trial from Europe randomized 85 patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to either standard treatment (e.g., oxygen, bronchodilators) or standard treatment plus noninvasive pressure-support ventilation delivered through a face mask. All patients had at least two of the following: a respiratory rate above 30 breaths/min, a PaO2 below 45 mm Hg, and arterial pH below 7.35 on room air. The mean baseline arterial blood gas values were pH, 7.28; PaO2, 40 mm Hg; and PaCO2, 69 mm Hg. Patients with an immediate need for intubation and those with complicating illnesses were excluded. Compared with controls, patients receiving noninvasive ventilation were significantly less likely to be intubated (26 vs. 74 percent). The noninvasive ventilation group also had significant reductions in complications, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality (9 vs. 29 percent). Comment: This is the second randomized trial to support the use of noninvasive ventilation in selected cases of acute COPD exacerbation (see Journal Watch accession number 930706005 and Lancet 1993; 341:1555). An editorialist believes that noninvasive ventilation should become part of the "first-line treatment" for such patients.

— AS Brett

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine October 6, 1995

Citation(s):

Elliott MW. Noninvasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 1995 Sep 28 333 870-871.

Brochard L, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 1995 Sep 28 333 817-822.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1995. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.