From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST P. CARINII PNEUMONIA: THREE DRUGS COMPARED.

Most clinicians use trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) as first-line prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in HIV-infected patients, but the drug is tolerated poorly. This randomized, non-blinded study compared three regimens in 843 patients with fewer than 200 CD4 cells per cubic millimeter: one double-strength TMP-SMX tablet twice daily, dapsone (50 mg) twice daily, or monthly aerosolized pentamidine. The estimated 36-month risk for P. carinii pneumonia was similar in patients assigned to TMP-SMX (18 percent), dapsone (17 percent) and pentamidine (21 percent). However, a majority of patients in the TMP-SMX and dapsone groups had dose reductions or were switched to an alternate therapy because of toxicity. Reanalysis according to the drug actually being taken at pneumonia onset found TMP-SMX to be the most effective. Treatment failures on dapsone were more common at 50 mg than 100 mg per day. In patients with baseline CD4 counts below 100, both oral drugs appeared superior to aerosolized pentamidine, even in the intention- to-treat analysis. Comment: This report confirms that TMP-SMX provides the best pneumocystis prophylaxis in patients who can tolerate it. An editorial implies that lower doses of TMP-SMX might reduce drug toxicity without compromising efficacy, and that it might be rational to use inhaled pentamidine until the CD4 count drops to 100, after which TMP-SMX should be introduced.

— AS Brett

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine March 24, 1995

Citation(s):

Clumeck N. Primary prophylaxis against opportunistic infections in patients with AIDS. N Engl J Med 1995 Mar 16 332 739-740.

Bozzette SA, et al. A randomized trial of three antipneumocystis agents in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med 1995 Mar 16 332 693-699.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1995. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.