From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

VARICELLA VACCINE -- USE AND STRATEGIES.

On March 17 the FDA licensed the varicella vaccine Varivax. Many pediatricians will not give the vaccine until it is "officially" recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The Academy's guidelines appear in the May issue of Pediatrics. One dose of varicella vaccine is recommended for children between 12 and 18 months of age who have no history of varicella, although children up to 13 years of age may receive a "catch up" vaccination. From 13 years on, two doses of vaccine are recommended, preferably four to eight weeks apart. Immunocompromised children should not receive this live attenuated vaccine, but there are exceptions -- such as those on low-dose prednisone (below 2mg/kg/d) for asthma and nephrosis. Anyone with a history of chickenpox does not require vaccination. Whether those over 18 years without such a history should be serologically screened and immunized only if seronegative, or simply immunized without serologic testing, is unclear. A cost-effectiveness study appearing in the same issue finds that testing adolescents with a negative or uncertain history of chickenpox is significantly more cost-effective than vaccinating all teens with a negative history. Their decision-analysis model found that a "test all" policy in a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 adolescents without a history of chickenpox cost $287 for each case of chickenpox prevented, versus $517 in a "vaccinate all" policy. In children between 6 and 12 years, the respective costs were $164 and $166. (In an earlier study, the authors determined the cost per case of preventing varicella in preschoolers to be just over $2.) Comment: Depending on the practice setting (office, public clinic, or HMO), costs will vary. A "test-all-susceptible" policy in teens, though most cost-effective, is clinically the least effective, since another visit might be necessary; those who foot the bill will probably not feel that the extra cost of the extra visit is worthwhile.

— RA Dershewitz

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine May 16, 1995

Citation(s):

Lieu TA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of varicella serotesting versus presumptive vaccination of school-age children and adolescents. Pediatrics 1995 May 95 632-638.

Committee on Infectious Diseases. Recommendations for the use of live, attenuated varicella vaccine. Pediatrics 1995 May 95 791-796.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1995. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.