From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

DANAPAROID FOR DVT.

Heparin, the standard treatment for deep venous thrombosis, carries a major risk for bleeding. This multicenter, randomized trial from the Netherlands compared heparin with danaparoid -- a mixture of low-molecular-weight heparan sulfate, dermatan sulfate, and chondroitin sulfate that has no effect on platelet function. Investigators enrolled 209 consecutive patients with suspected DVT; 188 had confirmed DVT and completed the trial, receiving either standard-dose adjusted intravenous heparin or subcutaneous danaparoid (1250 or 2000 units twice daily after an IV loading dose). After five to eight days, the patients given high-dose (but not low-dose) danaparoid had significantly less recurrence or extension of venous thromboembolism than the heparin group (13 vs. 28 percent) and less recurrent pulmonary embolism (7 vs. 24 percent). Major bleeds occurred in two patients given heparin versus one in each danaparoid group, although significantly more danaparoid-treated patients had risk factors for bleeding. Comment: These findings suggest that danaparoid may be a useful alternative to standard heparin for DVT. But they need confirmation in larger trials, some of which should compare danaparoid with low-molecular-weight heparins and evaluate costs. This trial received partial funding from the maker of danaparoid.

— CD Mulrow

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine July 7, 1995

Citation(s):

de Valk HW, et al. Comparing subcutaneous danaparoid with intravenous unfractionated heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1995 Jul 1 123 1-9.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1995. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.