From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

PREDICTING CARDIAC EVENTS AFTER THROMBOLYSIS.

Exercise testing is a useful tool for predicting prognosis after myocardial infarction. However, some studies have shown it to be less effective in patients given thrombolytic therapy. This prospective trial compared the value of exercise electrocardiography (EECG) and thallium-201 imaging for predicting cardiac events in 100 patients who had received thrombolytic therapy after MI and remained stable 6 weeks later. A total of 147 patients were originally identified as candidates for the study, but 47 were excluded because they were either too ill to be tested or had a cardiac event during the 6 weeks after thrombolysis.

All patients underwent both EECG and thallium imaging, and were then followed for 8 to 32 months. During this time 37 patients had cardiac events. EECG had a sensitivity of 35 percent for detecting cardiac events and a specificity of 68 percent, compared to 89 and 44 percent for thallium imaging. The positive predictive value for EECG was 39 percent and for thallium imaging was 49 percent; the corresponding negative predictive values were 64 and 88 percent.

Comment: The key finding in this study is that EECG testing was a poor predictor of cardiac events in patients who have received thrombolysis. Another interesting result is that a negative thallium study was a fairly good predictor of no adverse events.

— KI Marton

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine November 15, 1996

Citation(s):

Basu S et al. Value of thallium-201 imaging in detecting adverse cardiac events after myocardial infarction and thrombolysis: a follow up of 100 consecutive patients. BMJ 1996 Oct 5 313 844 -848.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1996. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.