From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

PACLITAXEL PLUS CISPLATIN FOR OVARIAN CANCER.

Paclitaxel (taxol) has shown promise as single-agent chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer. This randomized study compared six cycles of paclitaxel plus cisplatin with the standard combination of cyclophosphamide plus cisplatin in 386 women with incompletely resected stage III or any stage IV ovarian cancer. None of the women had undergone previous chemotherapy.

Among the 216 women who entered the study with clinically measurable disease, those who received the paclitaxel- cisplatin combination had a significantly higher rate of complete clinical response than women who received the standard combination (51 vs. 31 percent). Overall, the paclitaxel-cisplatin group also had longer median progression-free survival (18 vs. 13 months) and longer median survival (38 vs. 24 months). Neutropenia, fever, alopecia, and allergic reactions were more common with paclitaxel plus cisplatin than with cyclophosphamide plus cisplatin.

Comment: Further research may lead to refinements in paclitaxel dosing that will improve efficacy or minimize toxicity. But in the meantime, an editorialist concludes that the paclitaxel-cisplatin combination should be considered "standard therapy for women with advanced ovarian cancer."

— AS Brett

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine January 12, 1996

Citation(s):

McGuire WP et al. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 1996 Jan 4 334 1-6.

Neijt JP. New therapy for ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 1996 Jan 4 334 50-51.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1996. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.