From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

ROLLERBLADE SAFETY DEVICES PROVE WORTHWHILE.

Last year, an estimated 1 in 250 U.S. rollerbladers suffered an injury serious enough to require emergency room care. Do the safety devices marketed with high-speed skates (helmets, knee pads, elbow pads and wrist guards) actually offer any protection in this dangerous sport?

CDC investigators interviewed 161 injured rollerbladers who sought care at selected U.S. emergency rooms, and then constructed four small case-control studies of injury to four body parts (wrist, elbow, knee, and head). Participants ranged from 6 to 59 years old, and 48 percent were male; all levels of rollerblade expertise were represented. About half the subjects were not wearing any safety gear when they were injured, half wore at least one form of protection, and less than ten percent wore all possible safety devices.

After adjustment for confounders, wrist guards decreased risk for wrist injury about ten-fold. Elbow pads were similarly protective against elbow injuries. Neither knee nor head injuries were seen frequently enough for the effectiveness of knee pads and helmets to be adequately assessed.

Comment: This study (whose design probably led to underestimates of the protective efficacy of each device) should be taken in conjunction with others that confirm the life-saving potential of helmets in high-speed sports. Physicians now have the necessary ammunition for endorsing safety gear to their rollerblading patients.

— A Zuger

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine December 10, 1996

Citation(s):

Schieber RA et al. Risk factors for injuries from in-line skating and the effectiveness of safety gear. N Engl J Med 1996 Nov 28 335 1630-1635.

Thompson RS; Rivara FP. Protective equipment for in-line skaters. N Engl J Med 1996 Nov 28 335 1680-1681.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1996. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.