From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

SUPPRESSED STUDY RELEASED: BRAND AND GENERIC LEVOTHYROXINE FOUND BIOEQUIVALENT.

Are generic and brand drugs bioequivalent? This single-blind, four-way, cross-over trial set out to answer that question, and spurred controversy about withholding research results in the process.

Researchers randomized 22 women with hypothyroidism to receive each of four (two brand and two generic) preparations of levothyroxine for six-week periods. No difference was found in peak serum concentrations and other measures of bioequivalence. There was no evidence of increased side effects with any of the four agents. This study was heavily publicized in the lay press because its sponsors -- the manufacturers of the leading brand preparation of levothyroxine (Synthroid) -- blocked its publication for at least two years and threatened legal action.

A second study showed that withholding research results is surprisingly common. Researchers mailed surveys to 3,394 life science faculty members at 50 universities with NIH funding. Of 2,167 respondents, 20 percent reported that publication of results had been delayed more than six months at least once in the last three years for reasons related to corporate interests (e.g., to allow patent application, protect a scientific lead, or slow dissemination of undesired results). Nine percent of respondents reported refusing to share research results with other university scientists.

Comment: The thyroid study, which demonstrated the bioequivalence of four levothyroxine preparations, will probably be remembered more for what it revealed about the ugly side of corporate funding than for its actual results. The authors point out that substituting less expensive versions for the leading brand preparation of levothyroxine could save as much as $356 million per year.

— TH Lee

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine April 25, 1997

Citation(s):

Dong BJ et al. Bioequivalence of generic and brand-name levothyroxine products in the treatment of hypothyroidism. JAMA 1997 Apr 16 277 1205-1213.

Blumenthal D et al. Withholding research results in academic life science: Evidence from a national survey of faculty. JAMA 1997 Apr 16 277 1224-1228.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1997. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.