From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Intensive Glucose Control and Complications in Type 2 Diabetes.

Two long-awaited reports from the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) shed light on the question of whether good control of type 2 diabetes with intensive treatment helps to reduce complications. In UKPDS 33, 3,867 patients (median age, 54 years) with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] between 108 and 270 mg/dl after three months dieting) were randomized to either intensive or conventional treatment. The intensive group received sulfonylurea (chlorpropamide, glyburide [glibenclamide], or glipizide) or insulin sufficient to keep FPG below 108 mg/dl. The conventional group received diet advice; drugs were added only if needed to keep FPG below 270 mg/dl or for symptomatic hyperglycemia.

During a 10-year follow-up, median HbA 1c was 7.0 percent in the intensive group and 7.9 percent in the conventional group. The intensive group had a significant 12 percent reduction in total diabetes-related endpoints (e.g., cardiovascular, peripheral vascular, eye, and renal), mainly due to fewer microvascular events, especially retinal photocoagulation. In addition, the intensive group had 10 percent fewer diabetes-related deaths (including deaths from MI and stroke) and 6 percent lower all-cause mortality, but these reductions were not statistically significant. The intensive group had significantly more hypoglycemic episodes and greater weight gain.

UKPDS 34 focused on 1,704 overweight patients, many of whom were also part of the UKPDS 33 analysis. Intensive treatment with metformin was compared with conventional treatment, and a secondary analysis compared metformin with chlorpropamide, glyburide, and insulin. Compared with the conventional group, the metformin group had significant reductions of 32 percent, 42 percent, and 36 percent in the three endpoints. Moreover, compared with the other intensive groups, the metformin group had fewer diabetes-related endpoints and less weight gain and hypoglycemia.

Comment: The message seems to be that intensive therapy in type 2 diabetes reduces diabetes-related -- and especially microvascular -- events. Whether reductions in macrovascular events and mortality will become significant with further follow-up is unclear. Finally, the authors suggest that metformin might be considered as a first-line drug for obese patients.

— B Jarman

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine October 2, 1998

Citation(s):

UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998 Sep 12 352 837-853.

UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 1998 Sep 12 352 854-865.

Nathan DM. Some answers, more controversy, from UKPDS. Lancet 1998 Sep 12 352 832-833.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Other Perspectives

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1998. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.