From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

A Randomized Trial of Treatments for Low Back Pain.

Despite numerous studies on treating low back pain (LBP), the relative merits of different therapies remain unclear. In this randomized trial from a Seattle-area HMO, 321 adults with at least one week of LBP received the McKenzie method of physical therapy (PT), chiropractic manipulation, or an educational booklet. The PT and chiropractic groups received a maximum of nine sessions over one month. Most patients had had LBP for less than six weeks, and about half had more than two previous episodes. Patients with sciatica and those involved in compensation or litigation claims were excluded.

Compared with the booklet group, the chiropractic group had a modest but statistically significant reduction in a symptom score (p=0.02) and the PT group had a trend toward a lower score (p=0.06) at one month. However, there were no significant differences at three months, one year, and two years. During the year after the episode, the groups were similar in missed work, reduced activity, and additional visits for LBP.

Comment: This study suggests that for some patients, chiropractic and PT may bring speedier resolution of uncomplicated LBP than an educational booklet. However, it's quite possible that the mere fact of seeing a health care provider repeatedly -- rather than the therapies themselves -- was responsible for much of the benefit. Whether the marginally better short-term outcomes with PT and chiropractic justify the extra cost of these treatments is an obvious question for policy makers.

— AS Brett

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine October 9, 1998

Citation(s):

Cherkin DC et al. A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low back pain. N Engl J Med 1998 Oct 8 339 1021-1029.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1998. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.