From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Occult Bacteremia in the Post-H. influenzae Era.

Before widespread use of Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine, Hib was a frequent and dreaded cause of occult bacteremia in febrile, relatively well-appearing young children. Because Hib is now virtually eliminated, this study takes another look at the risk of occult bacteremia in highly febrile infants.

From 1993 through 1996, the emergency department at Children's Hospital in Boston evaluated almost 12,000 children between 3 and 36 months of age with temperatures of 39.0 degreesC or higher and no apparent source for their fever (except otitis media), who were well enough to be sent home. In blood cultures obtained from 79 percent of the children, a total of 149 (1.6 percent) contained pathogenic bacteria. The most common were Streptococcus pneumoniae (92 percent), salmonella species (5 percent), and Neisseria meningitidis (1 percent). Rates of bacteremia increased significantly with increasing temperature, white blood cell count (WBC), absolute neutrophil count, and absolute band count.

Comment: In contrast to previous reports, which suggested that 3 percent to 5 percent of well-appearing, febrile children have occult bacteremia, this study found an incidence of 1.6 percent, with S. pneumoniae the most common agent. The clinician must decide empirically what WBC cut-off value makes sense when deciding whether to treat infants at risk for occult bacteremia with antibiotics. The authors feel that 18,000 is a reasonable choice.

— RA Dershewitz

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine August 7, 1998

Citation(s):

Lee GM and Harper MB. Risk of bacteremia for febrile young children in the post-Haemophilus influenzae type b era. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998 Jul 152 624-628.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1998. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.