From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Is Hormone Therapy Beneficial for Women with Known CAD?

A compelling reason for postmenopausal women to consider hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is to reduce their risk for coronary artery disease. However, the supporting evidence is derived primarily from nonrandomized observational studies, which may have been biased if healthier women chose to take HRT. This blinded multicenter trial evaluated the effects of daily estrogen (0.625 mg) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (2.5 mg) against placebo in 2,763 randomized, postmenopausal women (mean age, 67 years) with known coronary disease and an intact uterus.

During an average follow-up of four years, hormone therapy had a beneficial effect on lipid levels, but cardiovascular outcomes between the two groups did not differ overall. Women receiving HRT had more coronary events in year 1 of the study, and fewer in years 4 and 5. Rates of cancer and total mortality were similar, but the women receiving HRT had a significant increase in thromboembolic events (34 vs. 12 events) and gallbladder disease (84 vs. 62 episodes).

Comment: This important study calls into question whether hormone therapy actually reduces coronary events in women with preexisting coronary disease, but it does not definitively preclude such effects. The trend toward fewer coronary events with HRT in the later years of the study suggests that long-term treatment may be needed to produce benefits that outweigh early harms. Finally, these findings are not necessarily applicable to primary prevention in women without known coronary disease.

— TH Lee

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine August 28, 1998

Citation(s):

Hulley S et al. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. JAMA 1998 Aug 19 280 605-613.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1998. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.