From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

No Lettuce, No Ice Cubes

Worldwide travel is increasing, but the last large-scale look at traveler's diarrhea was almost 20 years ago. The first part of a new global study of the disease focused on travelers to Jamaica, where tourism has tripled since 1980.

Of more than 30,000 travelers surveyed before leaving the Montego Bay airport in 1996 and 1997, 23.6 percent reported traveler's diarrhea, with moderate-to-severe symptoms in 85 percent. Diarrhea was more common in 16- to 35-year-olds than those over 55 (26.6 percent vs. 12.1 percent), in honeymooners than business travelers (30.2 percent vs. 16.1 percent), and in those from the U.K. (42 percent) or the U.S. (22.6 percent) than those from Japan (11.7 percent) or Latin America (6.2 percent).

Fewer than 3 percent of those surveyed followed standard dietary precautions. Ninety-five percent had ice cubes; 90 percent had salads; 80 percent had dairy products and tap water; 55 percent had ice cream, hamburgers, or incompletely cooked fish or poultry; and 24 percent ate from street vendors. Only 2 percent took prophylactic medication, usually bismuth subsalicylate. Pathogens were isolated in 31.7 percent of 322 stool specimens from acutely ill hotel guests: most often enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), followed by rotavirus and salmonella.

Comment: This study suggests that traveler's diarrhea is about as common as it was 20 years ago and that most travelers are quite cavalier about precautions. Whether an ETEC vaccine, currently under development, will be cost effective is unknown.

— A Zuger

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine March 23, 1999

Citation(s):

Steffen R et al. Epidemiology, etiology and impact of traveler's diarrhea in Jamaica. JAMA 1999 Mar 3 281 811-817.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1999. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.