From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

A New Tool for Assessing Cardiac Risk in Noncardiac Surgery

One purpose of a preoperative medical evaluation is to determine a patient's risk for cardiac complications. These researchers developed an index for predicting cardiac complications (i.e., myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, ventricular fibrillation, cardiac arrest, and complete heart block) among patients undergoing major nonemergent noncardiac surgery. The index was derived from 2,893 patients and validated in 1,422 patients, all aged 50 or older.

The model identified six independent predictors of cardiac complications: high-risk surgery, history of ischemic heart disease, history of congestive heart failure, history of cerebrovascular disease, insulin therapy, and serum creatinine above 2.0 mg/dl. In the derivation cohort, the presence of zero, one, two, or more than two predictors was associated with cardiac complication rates of 0.5 percent, 1.3 percent, 3.6 percent, and 9.1 percent, respectively. Outcomes were similar in the validation cohort.

Comment: This model, called the "Revised Cardiac Risk Index" by the authors, performed more accurately in this population than two well-known, previously published indexes (those of Goldman and Detsky). What remains open to debate is how clinicians should use these data. Possibilities for patients with two or more risk factors include preoperative noninvasive testing for coronary disease or strategies to reduce intra- and postoperative oxygen consumption.

— AS Brett

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine September 17, 1999

Citation(s):

Lee TH et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation 1999 Sep 7 100 1043-1049.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1999. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.