From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Nerve-Root Injections for Lumbar Radicular Pain

Results from a recent randomized trial showed that epidural steroid injections did not change 1-year outcomes in patients with sciatica (JW Jul 1 1997, accession number 970613005, and N Engl J Med 1997; 336:1634). An alternative is selective nerve-root steroid injections, with placement of the injecting needle adjacent to the affected nerve-root under fluoroscopic guidance.

Researchers at Washington University in St. Louis enrolled 55 patients with lumbar radicular pain and radiographically confirmed nerve-root compression (by a herniated disc or foraminal stenosis). All participants had undergone at least 6 weeks of conservative therapy without benefit and had requested conventional surgical intervention; at this time, they were offered the alternative of enrolling in this double-blind study. Patients were randomized to receive a selective nerve-root injection with either bupivicaine alone or bupivicaine plus betamethasone; at the patients' request, up to 3 additional injections could be given. During an average follow-up of about 2 years, the proportion of patients opting to proceed with surgery was significantly lower in the steroid group than in the control group (29 percent vs. 67 percent).

Comment: Some key information is missing from this article, including the average duration of symptoms before enrollment and whether any demographic subgroups seemed more likely to respond. Nevertheless, the results suggest that nerve-root injection might be worthwhile before patients with lumbar radicular pain proceed to surgery. This interventional trial deserves to be repeated at other centers.

— AS Brett

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine December 26, 2000

Citation(s):

Riew KD et al. The effect of nerve-root injections on the need for operative treatment of lumbar radicular pain. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000 Nov 82-A 1589-1593.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2000. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.