From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

CPR Without Mouth-to-Mouth Ventilation

A small body of animal and human research suggests, perhaps surprisingly, that mouth-to-mouth ventilation may not improve outcomes for patients who undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. To test this theory, researchers in Seattle studied 520 episodes of presumed cardiac arrest in which bystanders (not trained in CPR) telephoned emergency services dispatchers. During the calls, cases were randomized, and the dispatchers provided instructions on how to perform CPR, either with chest compression alone or with chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation; callers were told to continue until the paramedics arrived.

Survival to hospital discharge was 14.6 percent among those patients who received chest compression alone, and 10.4 percent among those who received chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation (*P*=0.18). Dispatchers were able to complete their instructions completely in 81 percent of the former cases but in only 62 percent of the latter -- a significant difference.

Comment: In this study, untrained bystanders who performed chest compression without mouth-to-mouth ventilation were at least as effective as those who provided CPR with both maneuvers. The implications of these results are considerable, because performing mouth-to-mouth ventilation makes CPR more complicated and deters some people from wanting to do CPR at all. Whether these results would hold for CPR done by rigorously trained people is unclear. In any case, an editorialist -- a CPR researcher -- states that this report is "of immense importance and will have worldwide implications."

— AS Brett

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine June 9, 2000

Citation(s):

Hallstrom A et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by chest compression alone or with mouth-to-mouth ventilation. N Engl J Med 2000 May 25 342 1546-1553.

Ewy GA. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation -- strengthening the links in the chain of survival. N Engl J Med 2000 May 25 342 1599-1601.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2000. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.