From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Risk Factors for Osteoporotic Fracture in Nursing Home Residents

Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a known risk factor for fracture among elderly white females, but what other factors are important? In this prospective cohort study, researchers analyzed data on a high-risk population -- 1427 white female nursing home residents aged 65 and older. Baseline clinical, cognitive, and functional status data were collected between 1995 and 1997, and clinically detected osteoporotic fractures were recorded during the following 18 months.

A total of 223 fractures occurred in 180 women; the 2 major independent predictors were low BMD and transfer independence (i.e., ability to move to or from a bed, chair, or wheelchair without supervision). There was evidence of an interaction between these 2 variables: Women who were independent in transfer had a hazard ratio of 3.1 for fracture if their BMDs were below the median, and a substantial increase in risk for every decrease of 1 standard deviation in BMD. In contrast, women who were dependent in transfer with a BMD below the median had a hazard ratio of 1.6. For hip fracture specifically, the risk was 2.5 times higher in women with BMD below the median among those who were independent in transfer, but not among those who were dependent in transfer.

Comment: These data confirm the importance of BMD as a predictor of fracture risk, and also show that women who are mobile have a higher risk for falling and suffering fractures. Interventions to increase BMD and to reduce the risk for falling among these women may be helpful.

— TH Lee

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine September 12, 2000

Citation(s):

Chandler JM et al. Low bone mineral density and risk of fracture in white female nursing home residents. JAMA 2000 Aug 23 284 972-977.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2000. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.