From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Another Study of Anticoagulation After MI

Aspirin plus low-intensity warfarin (INR, 2.0-2.5) was superior to aspirin alone in secondary prevention of MI.

Aspirin is used routinely for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction, but is warfarin better? In this open-label, multicenter, Norwegian trial, 3630 MI patients were randomized to receive warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.8-4.2), aspirin (160 mg daily), or both (75-mg aspirin plus warfarin with a target INR of 2.0-2.5).

Mean follow-up was about 4 years. A composite outcome of death, nonfatal MI, and thromboembolic stroke occurred in 20% of the aspirin group, 16.7% of the warfarin group (rate ratio compared with aspirin, 0.81), and 15% of the combination-therapy group (RR compared with aspirin, 0.71). The difference between the 2 warfarin groups was not significant. Serious bleeding (per treatment year) occurred in 0.62% of patients who received any warfarin and in 0.17% of patients who received aspirin only.

Comment: These data support the conclusions of another recent study (Journal Watch Aug 27 2002) that suggested that anticoagulation or combination therapy with aspirin and anticoagulants was superior to aspirin alone in preventing recurrent cardiac events. In earlier studies, investigators had failed to show such an association, possibly because lower INRs were achieved in those trials. However, an editorialist points out that percutaneous coronary interventions (such as angioplasty with stenting), which are common among MI patients in the U.S., make antiplatelet therapies to prevent thrombosis particularly attractive. He predicts that antiplatelet therapy will remain the standard of care in many countries, but the reduction in event rates with combination therapy suggests an added benefit from low-intensity warfarin therapy. It remains to be seen if the safety profile achieved for combination therapy in these clinical trials can be maintained in routine clinical practice.

— Kirsten E. Fleischmann, MD, MPH

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine October 22, 2002

Citation(s):

Hurlen M et al. Warfarin, aspirin, or both after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2002 Sep 26; 347:969-74.

Becker RC. Antithrombotic therapy after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2002 Sep 26; 347:1019-22.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2002. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.