From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

CRP vs. LDL for Predicting Cardiovascular Risk

CRP was a slightly better predictor of first cardiovascular events in these apparently healthy women.

There is persuasive evidence that C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of inflammation, is associated with cardiovascular disease. In this study, researchers compared the value of CRP levels and LDL-cholesterol levels for predicting cardiovascular risk.

LDL-cholesterol and CRP levels were measured at baseline in about 28,000 apparently healthy women (mean age, 55). During a mean follow-up of 8 years, the CRP level predicted a first cardiovascular event somewhat better than the LDL level did. For example, the relative risk for a first event was 2.3 in the highest quintile of CRP compared with the lowest quintile, after adjustment for other risk factors. With LDL, the corresponding relative risk was 1.5. The probability of event-free survival was about 99% in women whose CRP and LDL levels both were below the population medians, but was only about 96.5% in women whose CRP and LDL levels both were above the population medians. Subgroups with high CRP/low LDL levels and low CRP/high LDL levels had intermediate probabilities of event-free survival.

Comment: The CRP level appears to add predictive information to traditional risk factors for cardiovascular events, presumably because it reflects different aspects of the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. However, we don't have evidence yet that improved clinical outcomes would result from CRP screening. Thus, an editorialist cautions that "it may be premature to adopt widespread assessment of C-reactive protein."

— Allan S. Brett, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine November 26, 2002

Citation(s):

Ridker PM et al. Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2002 Nov 14; 347:1557-65.

Mosca L. C-reactive protein -- To screen or not to screen? N Engl J Med 2002 Nov 14; 347:1615-7.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2002. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.