From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Estrogen/Progestin Replacement in Older Women with Coronary Disease: No Benefit

Additional follow-up data from HERS show no cardiovascular benefit from hormone replacement therapy in older women with coronary disease.

In the blinded, randomized, 4.1-year Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS), researchers found no overall reduction in coronary events among postmenopausal women (mean age, 67) with coronary disease who received daily estrogen and progestin (Journal Watch Aug 28 1998). In 2 reports from an unblinded follow-up study (mean, 2.7 years of additional follow-up), investigators analyzed results for more than 2300 of the original 2763 women who participated in HERS.

No significant decreases were noted in rates of coronary events or secondary cardiovascular events among women who took hormones compared with those who took placebo, even after adjustment for confounders, including differing use of statins. During the entire 6.8 years of therapy, hormone recipients had a significant increase in risk for any thromboembolic event and for biliary-tract surgery (relative hazard, 2.08 and 1.48, respectively). Hormone recipients were somewhat more likely to suffer hip fractures than were placebo recipients (P=0.06). Cancer incidence was similar in the 2 groups; death rates were high and did not differ between groups.

Comment: These data strongly suggest that hormone replacement therapy confers no cardiovascular benefit in women with known coronary disease. However, the older women with coronary disease in this study differ markedly from the younger, healthier women who typically are treated with hormone replacement at menopause. Such younger, healthier women were among those included in the study population of the Women's Health Initiative, the results of which have just been published (Journal Watch Jul 26 2002).

— Robert W. Rebar, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine July 26, 2002

Citation(s):

Grady D et al. Cardiovascular disease outcomes during 6.8 years of hormone therapy: Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study follow-up (HERS II). JAMA 2002 Jul 3; 288:49-57.

Hulley S et al. Noncardiovascular disease outcomes during 6.8 years of hormone therapy: Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study follow-up (HERS II). JAMA 2002 Jul 3; 288:58-66.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2002. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.