From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Inappropriate Antibiotic Use in Respiratory Infections Is Improving (Sort Of)

But, in 1999, 10%-20% of children and adults with URIs still received broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Concern about inappropriate antibiotic use for presumed viral upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) resulted in the dissemination of clinical practice guidelines and professional association recommendations in the late 1990s. However, results from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys (NAMCS), which were conducted in 1993, 1995, 1997, and 1999, suggest that physician behavior was changing even before these guidelines were issued.

The sampled number of visits (mostly to primary care physicians) for viral respiratory infections ranged from 495 in 1999 to 1222 in 1995. Overall, antibiotic use in children with URIs dropped from about 40% in 1993 and 1995 to about 10% in 1997 and 1999; however, broad-spectrum antibiotics, which are of special concern because of increasing antibiotic resistance, were prescribed for about 10% of children in all years (and therefore constituted almost all antibiotic use in children with URIs in later years). Similar results were found for adults with URIs, with overall antibiotic prescriptions dropping from about 50% to 20% but with broad-spectrum antibiotic use persisting at about 18%.

Comment: Many physicians have changed their prescribing practices in response to initial research on inappropriate antibiotic use, but a floor seems to persist for the inappropriate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics.

— Thomas L. Schwenk, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine December 9, 2003

Citation(s):

Mainous AG III et al. Trends in antimicrobial prescribing for bronchitis and upper respiratory infections among adults and children. Am J Public Health 2003 Nov; 93:1910-4.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2003. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.