From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

ARBs vs. ACE Inhibitors After Myocardial Infarction with LV Dysfunction

All-cause mortality and secondary cardiovascular outcomes were similar in the monotherapy and combined-therapy groups.

Because angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) inhibit angiotensin II activity more completely than do angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, it's reasonable to wonder whether ARBs are better than ACE inhibitors for some indications. Researchers compared these 2 drug classes in this international, randomized, double-blind study of nearly 15,000 patients who had myocardial infarction (within 10 days before enrollment) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (mean ejection fraction, 35%). The maker of the ARB valsartan (Diovan) supported the study.

Patients received valsartan (up to 160 mg twice daily), captopril (up to 50 mg 3 times daily), or both drugs. After a median follow-up of 25 months, no significant differences were noted between groups in all-cause mortality or in secondary endpoints that included various combinations of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular outcomes. Patients who received combined therapy had a significantly lower rate of hospitalization for heart failure or MI than did other patients (17% vs. about 19% in each monotherapy group), but this analysis was post-hoc. Adverse events that resulted in dose reductions or drug discontinuation were more common with combined therapy than with monotherapy (48% vs. 43%).

Comment: Basing their conclusions on these results and the proven record of ACE inhibitors, editorialists state that ACE inhibitors should remain the first-line treatment for patients who are at high risk after MI. However, ARBs appear to be as effective as ACE inhibitors, as long as comparable dosages are used. Combined therapy could be valuable for some patients, but more research is needed to delineate that subgroup.

— Allan S. Brett, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine December 12, 2003

Citation(s):

Pfeffer MA et al. Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N Engl J Med 2003 Nov 13; 349:1893-906.

Mann DL and Deswal A. Angiotensin-receptor blockade in acute myocardial infarction -- A matter of dose. N Engl J Med 2003 Nov 13; 349:1963-5.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2003. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.