From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Another Study of First-Line Antihypertensive Therapy

Results from a new randomized trial differ from those from ALLHAT but don't necessarily complicate the question of which first-line therapy is best.

Results from the recently published American ALLHAT study suggested that the diuretic chlorthalidone was at least as good as the angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor lisinopril as first-line therapy for hypertension (Journal Watch Jan 14 2003). Now, findings from another study supported by both the Australian government and a maker of the ACE inhibitor enalapril, yield a slightly different conclusion.

In an open-label, randomized trial, 6083 hypertensive patients (mean blood pressure, 168/91 mm Hg) received either a diuretic or an ACE inhibitor as initial therapy. Hydrochlorothiazide and enalapril, respectively, were recommended (but not mandatory); additional drugs were given when monotherapy was inadequate. The patients' age range was 65 to 84; nearly all patients were white, and very few had diabetes or known coronary disease.

During 4 years of follow-up, extent of BP reduction was identical in the 2 groups. The frequency of the primary outcome -- all cardiovascular events or death from any cause -- was 56 per 1000 patient-years in the ACE inhibitor group and 60 per 1000 patient-years in the diuretic group, which was a barely significant difference (P=0.05). The ACE inhibitor group had a significantly lower rate of myocardial infarction but not of stroke or overall mortality.

Comment: The differing outcomes of this study and ALLHAT should not necessarily generate confusion: This study included relatively healthy white elders with few risk factors; in contrast, the baseline prevalence of cardiovascular disease and risk factors was much higher in the younger and racially mixed ALLHAT population. An editorialist reviews the 2 studies side by side and concludes that initial diuretic therapy still is appropriate, unless coexisting conditions indicate ACE inhibitors. A review article in the same issue of the New England Journal of Medicine provides a nice update on initial treatment for hypertension.

— Allan S. Brett, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine February 21, 2003

Citation(s):

Wing LMH et al. A comparison of outcomes with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for hypertension in the elderly. N Engl J Med 2003 Feb 13; 348:583-92.

Frohlich ED. Treating hypertension -- What are we to believe? N Engl J Med 2003 Feb 13; 348:639-41.

August P. Initial treatment of hypertension. N Engl J Med 2003 Feb 13; 348:610-7.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2003. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.