From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Should LVH Regression Be a Goal of Antihypertensive Treatment?

Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy during antihypertensive treatment was associated with improved outcomes, independent of blood-pressure reduction.

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a common consequence of hypertension and an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Treatment of hypertension can result in LVH regression and in reduced risk for adverse outcomes. But does LVH regression during antihypertensive treatment predict better cardiovascular outcomes independent of blood-pressure reduction?

In the LIFE study, 9193 patients with moderate hypertension (mean age, 67; mean BP, 174/98 mm Hg) and electrocardiographic (ECG) evidence of LVH were randomized to receive first-line antihypertensive therapy with the angiotensin-receptor blocker losartan or the ß-blocker atenolol. By a mean of 4.8 years, the losartan group had experienced significantly fewer adverse cardiovascular events (Journal Watch Apr 30 2002). All subjects underwent annual ECGs, and about 10% also had annual echocardiograms. LVH and LV mass index (LVMI) were defined by strict ECG and echocardiographic criteria, respectively.

Overall, mean LVH and LVMI decreased significantly throughout the study, although BP stabilized after 1 year. Lower on-treatment LVH and LVMI were associated strongly with reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, independent of randomized treatment, severity of baseline LVH, and baseline and on-treatment BP. After adjustment for these variables, a 1-standard-deviation decrease in ECG-defined on-treatment LVH was associated with significant decreases in cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (by 29%); cardiovascular mortality (by 38%); MI (by 19%); and stroke (by 27%). A 1-SD decrease in LVMI was associated with comparable benefits.

Comment: These data show that LVH, measured by ECG or echocardiography, independently predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients being treated for moderate hypertension. Further studies are needed to determine whether antihypertensive treatment directed at LVH regression would be more cardioprotective than treatment directed at BP reduction alone.

— Bruce Soloway, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine December 10, 2004

Citation(s):

Okin PM et al. Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy during antihypertensive treatment and the prediction of major cardiovascular events. JAMA 2004 Nov 17; 292:2343-9.

Devereux RB et al. Prognostic significance of left ventricular mass change during treatment of hypertension. JAMA 2004 Nov 17; 292:2350-6.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2004. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.