From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Antibacterial Cleaning Products Don't Prevent Infectious Disease Symptoms

At least not in the typical household . . .

Many cleaning products sold for home use contain antibacterial ingredients, but the benefit of these products for healthy people isn't clear. Investigators randomized 238 primarily Hispanic households in New York City to use household cleaning and hand washing products with or without antibacterial agents.

During 48 weeks of follow-up, no significant differences were found between groups in overall rates of infectious disease symptoms or in rates of any of the following symptoms: vomiting, diarrhea, fever, sore throat, runny nose, cough, or skin/conjunctivitis symptoms. In addition, no difference was noted in number of symptoms. These results were true for most subsets of participants, including children 5 years or younger and children who attended day care. Among people with chronic disease, those assigned to use antibacterial products were more likely to have fever (12% vs. 4%), runny nose (21% vs. 9%), or cough (22% vs. 7%) than were those who used non-antibacterial products.

Comment: The main limitation of this study is that the symptoms that were assessed might not have been the symptoms that antibacterial cleaners prevent. The authors state that the findings in people with chronic disease were unexpected and therefore should be investigated further. Another potential risk of antibacterial cleaners is the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. In any case, antibacterial products do not appear to yield benefits for the average household.

— Richard Saitz, MD, MPH, FACP, FASAM

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine March 19, 2004

Citation(s):

Larson EL et al. Effect of antibacterial home cleaning and handwashing products on infectious disease symptoms: A randomized, double-blind trial. Ann Intern Med 2004 Mar 2; 140:321-9.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2004. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.