From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

PSA Velocity Predicts Prostate Cancer Outcomes

Increases of more than 2.0 ng/mL yearly in PSA levels were significantly associated with prostate cancer mortality.

We need better ways to determine which prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-detected localized prostate cancers are most likely to progress. The rate at which the PSA level rises (i.e., PSA velocity) prior to a diagnosis of prostate cancer is a potential prognostic marker.

This study involved 1095 men with localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy but no adjuvant hormonal therapy. All men had undergone more than one PSA level determination before their diagnoses; biopsies were done when PSA levels exceeded 2.5 ng/mL. Most tumors (71%) were detected only by PSA screening. Median follow-up was 5 years.

Annual PSA velocity of more than 2.0 ng/mL was associated significantly with disease recurrence, death from prostate cancer, and death from any cause, compared with lower PSA velocity. For example, 24 of 262 men with annual PSA velocity of more than 2.0 ng/mL, but only 3 of 833 patients with lower PSA velocity, died from prostate cancer. In multivariable analysis, PSA velocity, PSA level at diagnosis, Gleason score on biopsy, and tumor stage at diagnosis all were significant predictors of death from prostate cancer.

Comment: In this study, PSA velocity before diagnosis of prostate cancer discriminated quite impressively between ultimately fatal and nonfatal cancers. The next challenge -- best addressed by randomized trials -- will be to determine whether this information can be used to inform treatment decisions.

— Allan S. Brett, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine July 13, 2004

Citation(s):

D'Amico AV et al. Preoperative PSA velocity and the risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med 2004 Jul 8; 351:125-35.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2004. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.