From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Endovascular vs. Open Repair of AAAs -- A Randomized Trial

The 30-day mortality rate after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair was decisively lower with endovascular procedures.

Endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (i.e., percutaneous placement of stent grafts via femoral artery catheters) is becoming a popular alternative to standard open repair. In a randomized, multicenter trial from the U.K., 1082 patients (mean age, 74) with AAAs measuring ≥5.5 cm underwent either endovascular or open repair electively. All AAAs were anatomically suitable for either procedure, and all patients were considered fit to undergo either procedure. In this report, the investigators present short-term mortality findings.

In intent-to-treat analyses, the 30-day all-cause postoperative mortality rate was significantly lower with endovascular repair than with open repair (1.7% vs. 4.7%), as was the median length of hospital stay (7 days vs. 12 days). During the 30-day follow-up, 2% of endovascular patients were converted to open repair, and about 3% required another procedure to correct endoleaks (i.e., leaks into the space between the graft and the aneurysmal sac). In the open-repair group, 3% required surgical reexploration.

Comment: In this trial -- probably the largest randomized comparison to date -- endovascular repair of AAAs was associated with a decisively lower 30-day mortality rate than was open repair. However, extrapolating the results to any given center or surgeon is no simple matter: The trial was conducted at both academic and community hospitals, and several different brands of endovascular devices were used. Given current uncertainty about the durability of endovascular repair, longer-term outcomes from this trial, which will be reported during the next few years, are eagerly anticipated.

— Allan S. Brett, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine September 10, 2004

Citation(s):

The EVAR Trial Participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: Randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004 Sep 4; 364:843-8.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2004. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.