From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Glucose-Insulin-Potassium Infusion After Myocardial Infarction

The results of this large study showed no benefit for GIK infusion in STEMI patients.

Among patients who suffer MIs with ST-segment elevation (STEMI), metabolic modulation by infusion of high-dose glucose, insulin, and potassium (GIK) has shown promise in small trials. Such a therapy could provide a widely available, low-cost intervention in developing countries. In a trial of GIK, 20,201 patients with STEMI (74% of whom received thrombolytic therapy) were randomized (80% within 8 hours of symptom onset) to placebo or high-dose GIK infusion. Most of the trial subjects were in China, India, and Latin America; Chinese and Indian subjects also participated in a concurrent trial of reviparin (Journal Watch Feb 15 2005).

Mortality rates in the two groups were similar at 30 days (about 10%), as were rates of cardiac arrest (about 1.5%), cardiogenic shock (about 6%), and reinfarction (about 2%). No differences were found in several subgroup analyses (e.g., patients with diabetes, patients with heart failure).

Comment: This results of this clinical trial of high-dose GIK, which involved more patients than have all previous trials combined, demonstrated no benefit for GIK infusion in patients with STEMI. According to an editorialist, this study establishes, beyond a reasonable doubt, that GIK therapy is not worthwhile.

— Thomas L. Schwenk, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine February 15, 2005

Citation(s):

The CREATE-ECLA Trial Group Investigators. Effect of glucose-insulin-potassium infusion on mortality in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: The CREATE-ECLA randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005 Jan 26; 293:437-46.

Califf RM. Simple principles of clinical trials remain powerful. JAMA 2005 Jan 26; 293:489-91.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Related Content

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2005. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.