From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Shorter Treatment for Some Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C

A 12-week regimen of combination therapy was effective for some patients with genotype 2 or 3 infections.

Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 2 and 3 are more responsive to treatment than are those with genotype 1. In this Italian trial that included 283 patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3, researchers determined whether the duration of treatment with peginterferon plus ribavirin could be shortened. Patients were randomized to a standard 24-week treatment group (70 patients) or to a "variable-duration" group (213 patients). In the latter group, patients with negative test results for HCV RNA at 4 weeks received only 12 weeks of treatment, and those with positive test results received full 24-week treatment courses.

In the standard group, 76% of patients had sustained virologic responses (no detectable HCV RNA at 24 weeks after therapy had been completed). In the variable-duration group, about two thirds of patients were negative for HCV RNA at 4 weeks and thus received only 12 weeks of treatment; their response rate was 85%. Eighty patients in the variable-duration group were positive for HCV RNA at 4 weeks and received full 24-week courses of treatment; their response rate was 64%.

Comment: Among chronic hepatitis C patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3, 12-week courses of peginterferon plus ribavirin are sufficient for those who test negative for HCV RNA after 4 weeks of therapy. These findings are particularly important given the expense and toxicity of prolonged treatment for HCV infections.

— Allan S. Brett, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine July 26, 2005

Citation(s):

Mangia A et al. Peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for 12 vs. 24 weeks in HCV genotype 2 or 3. N Engl J Med 2005 Jun 23; 352:2609-17.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2005. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.