From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Don't Delay Surgery After Hip Fracture

Patients who did not receive surgery within 24 hours of hip fracture had higher mortality rates.

Patients who sustain hip fractures do not always undergo surgery within 24 hours of the injury. To determine the consequences of such delays, investigators evaluated data from all U.K. hospitals with at least 100 admissions for femoral neck fracture between April 2001 and March 2004.

During the study period, 129,522 admissions occurred for femoral neck fracture among older patients (age, ≥65); 93% of patients underwent surgery. Forty percent of the procedures were performed more than 1 day after admission, and 21% were delayed for more than 2 days. Factors associated with delay included older age, female sex, low socioeconomic status, and comorbidity.

A total of 18,508 in-hospital deaths occurred during the study. After adjustment for confounding factors, delay in surgery was associated significantly with higher risk for in-hospital death (relative risk, 1.27 for delay ≥1 day). Had delays in surgery been avoided, the authors estimate that 9% of all hip-fracture–related deaths could have been averted in the U.K. each year. Delays in surgery were not associated with readmission rates.

Comment: These results support the practice of performing surgery for hip fracture within 24 hours. In another recent study, early surgery was associated with less pain and shorter length of stay but not with lower mortality rates (Journal Watch Apr 30 2004). At the time of publication, the full text of the original article was available free of charge.

— Keith I. Marton, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine May 19, 2006

Citation(s):

Bottle A and Aylin P. Mortality associated with delay in operation after hip fracture: Observational study. BMJ 2006 Apr 22; 332:947-51.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2006. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.