From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

What Is the Appropriate Screening Interval After Negative Colonoscopy?

Longitudinal data support a 10-year interval between colonoscopies in low-risk patients.

The recommendation that screening colonoscopy need not be repeated for 10 years after a negative exam is based mostly on expert opinion and on the timing of the adenoma–carcinoma sequence. Now, investigators in Manitoba, Canada, have conducted a retrospective analysis to estimate risk for developing colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy.

Using linked data from a population-based cancer registry and a medical-claims database, researchers identified 32,203 people who had negative screening colonoscopies and no prior history of colorectal cancer, colon resection, or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Follow-up after negative colonoscopy ranged from 6 months to 14 years. Compared with the general population, study subjects had significantly lower risk for colorectal cancer in the years following their negative colonoscopies. Standardized incidence ratios were 0.69 at 6 months, 0.55 at 5 years, and 0.28 at 10 years.

Comment: An editorialist notes that these data do not address the appropriate screening interval in higher-risk patients, such as those with IBD, or in patients who have polyps. However, in low-risk patients with negative exams, a screening interval of 10 years, and probably longer, is reasonable.

— Thomas L. Schwenk, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine May 30, 2006

Citation(s):

Singh H et al. Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: Evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA 2006 May 24/31; 295:2366-73.

Church TR. Screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy: Adding to the evidence. JAMA 2006 May 24/31; 295:2411-2.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Related Content

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2006. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.