From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

CT Angiography and CT Venography for Pulmonary Embolism

Adding CT venography to CT angiography improved sensitivity somewhat, but positive and negative predictive values changed minimally.

Increasingly, computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is used as a stand-alone test for diagnosing pulmonary embolism. Some authorities have advocated addition of venous-phase CT venography (CTV), in which pelvic and thigh veins are imaged after the pulmonary arteries. With CTA-CTV, screening can be accomplished for both deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism during the same examination.

In the Prospective Investigation Of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis II (PIOPED II), researchers performed multidetector CTA-CTV in 824 patients (mostly outpatients) with suspected pulmonary embolism. According to a complex reference standard (involving ventilation-perfusion scanning, conventional pulmonary angiography, leg ultrasound, and the Wells score to determine clinical pretest probability), 23% of patients had pulmonary embolism. The performances of CTA alone and CTA-CTV for diagnosing pulmonary embolism are shown in the Table. Although the addition of CTV improved sensitivity somewhat, positive and negative predictive values changed minimally.


View this table:
[in a new window]
 
Table: CTA vs. CTA-CTV

 

Comment: In this study, the accuracy of CTA (mostly 4-slice multidetector scanning) was similar to that found in previous studies. The 83% sensitivity suggests an unacceptable false-negative rate; however, other studies indicate that CTA-negative patients whose clinical probability of pulmonary embolism is low can safely be followed without anticoagulation and that D-dimer testing can help to refine clinical probability (Journal Watch Apr 29 2005 and Journal Watch Jan 31 2006). An editorialist believes that CT venography does not improve diagnostic accuracy sufficiently to justify the additional radiation dose.

— Allan S. Brett, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine June 20, 2006

Citation(s):

Stein PD et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2006 Jun 1; 354:2317-27.

Perrier A and Bounameaux H. Accuracy or outcome in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2006 Jun 1; 354:2383-5.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Related Content

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2006. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.