From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Serious Complications of Colonoscopy Are Not Rare

Colonoscopy with biopsy was associated with increased risk for complications.

Because colonoscopy is a widely recommended screening test, precise population-based data on complications are important. To identify serious complications, investigators at Northern California Kaiser Permanente health system reviewed electronic records of 16,318 colonoscopies performed from 1994 to 2002 in patients aged 40 or older. Colonoscopies performed for symptoms were excluded. Complications (bleeding, perforation, diverticulitis, other) were identified by hospital admission or death within 30 days of the procedure and were further evaluated by detailed chart review.

The most common indications for colonoscopy were polyps seen on sigmoidoscopy (45%, with nearly all involving biopsy) and history of polyps (23%, with half involving biopsy); only 0.7% were primary screening tests. The overall incidence of serious complications was 5 per 1000. Among 5235 colonoscopies that did not involve biopsies, the incidence of serious complications was 0.8 per 1000; the incidence of perforations was 0.6 per 1000. Among 11,083 colonoscopies that involved biopsies, the incidence of serious complications was 7.0 per 1000; the incidence of bleeding was 4.8 per 1000 (1.4 for bleeding requiring surgery or transfusion), and the incidence of perforation was 1.1 per 1000. The risk for perforation was higher in patients aged 60 and older. Overall, 40% of all serious complications and 62% of bleeding episodes occurred after removal of polyps smaller than 10 mm.

Comment: An incidence of serious complications of about 1 in 200 is not small for a preventive procedure done in an asymptomatic population. The main limitation of this study is that the results do not apply to complications associated with colonoscopy as a primary screening tool, because so few procedures were done for this purpose. Nevertheless, we need to reduce the risks associated with colonoscopy as we await safer accurate screening tests for colorectal cancer. Patients and physicians should consider these risks when balancing the benefits of colonoscopy against the lower risks associated with other screening tests.

— Richard Saitz, MD, MPH, FACP, FASAM

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine January 16, 2007

Citation(s):

Levin TR et al. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med 2006 Dec 19; 145:880-6.

Reader Remarks:

Read all Reader Remarks on this article

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

(more...)

Related Content

Other Perspectives

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2007. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.