From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Clinical Predictors of Hip Fracture in Postmenopausal Women

A new algorithm accurately predicts 5-year risk; the next step is to test its clinical utility prospectively.

Several clinical factors are associated with an increased risk for hip fracture, but their relative importance and the best way to assess them together are unknown. Investigators analyzed a mean of nearly 8 years of follow-up data from the Women’s Health Initiative for more than 90,000 subjects and 1132 hip fractures to develop a predictive algorithm based on common clinical factors. The algorithm was validated in a separate cohort of nearly 70,000 subjects (and 791 fractures) with similar follow-up.

Regression analysis revealed 11 readily available factors associated with increased fracture risk: increasing age, fair to poor self-reported health, relatively greater height, relatively lighter weight, any fracture after age 54, white race or ethnicity, sedentary lifestyle, current smoking, parental hip fracture, current corticosteroid use, and treatment for diabetes. The model was significantly predictive and more accurate than dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at widely varying levels of hip-fracture risk.

Comment: This model is potentially very helpful to clinicians, because by interactively weighing several readily available clinical factors, it could support decisions about bone-mineral density (BMD) screening or treatment for low BMD. A Web-based interactive calculator is available at http://hipcalculator.fhcrc.org. However, the algorithm must be evaluated prospectively before it can be used confidently in daily practice.

Thomas L. Schwenk, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine December 11, 2007

Citation(s):

Robbins J et al. Factors associated with 5-year risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. JAMA 2007 Nov 28; 298:2389.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Related Content

Other Perspectives

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2007. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.