From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Quantitative Fecal Occult Blood Testing Promising

A noninvasive screening test for colorectal cancer would be useful.

Guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) are nonspecific and insensitive. Researchers with support from the maker of a quantitative immunochemical FOBT specific for human hemoglobin tested its performance in 1000 ambulatory adults undergoing elective colonoscopy. Some patients were asymptomatic, some were at high risk for cancer, and some were symptomatic.

At colonoscopy, cancer was detected in 17 patients, and advanced polyps in 74. Fecal hemoglobin concentrations were significantly higher in these patients than in others. A fecal hemoglobin threshold of 75 ng/dL (as measured in 3 samples) was used to define an abnormal result; at this level, the immunochemical FOBT had a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 91% for advanced neoplasia. For cancer, sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 88%.

Comment: Because the quantitative immunochemical FOBT appears to have reasonable sensitivity and specificity for a screening test, some people might use it to select patients for colonoscopy. But people who desire greater certainty will likely forgo this test, as they forgo the guaiac-based tests. An editorialist recommends that quantitative FOBTs be preferred to guaiac-based tests whenever an FOBT is a component of a screening strategy. In the U.S., some currently available immunochemical FOBTs can be reported quantitatively, but they are not generally used that way yet.

— Richard Saitz, MD, MPH, FACP, FASAM

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine March 22, 2007

Citation(s):

Levi Z et al. A quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal neoplasia. Ann Intern Med 2007 Feb 20; 146:244-55.

Imperiale TF. Quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood tests: Is it time to go back to the future? Ann Intern Med 2007 Feb 20; 146:309-11.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Related Content

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2007. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.