From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Functional MRI to Distinguish Between Vegetative and Minimally Conscious Patients

Brain activity was monitored as a close relative spoke the patient’s name.

Unlike patients in vegetative states, those in minimally conscious states (MCSs) retain some awareness. In this study of 11 patients — 7 thought to be in vegetative states and 4 thought to be in MCSs by clinical examination — Chinese researchers used functional MRI to evaluate brain activation while a close relative spoke the patient’s name.

The researchers assumed that activation limited to the auditory cortex (in response to the spoken name) implies no conscious awareness, whereas more widespread activation implies possible awareness. Functional MRI revealed activation in areas beyond the auditory cortex in all four MCS patients, but also in two of the seven patients thought to be in vegetative states. Three months later, the two vegetative patients with widespread activation had evolved clinically to MCS, while clinical examination of the other five patients (with activation limited to the auditory cortex) still suggested vegetative states.

Comment: In this study, researchers used functional MRI to distinguish between vegetative and minimally conscious states. The widespread activation noted in two clinically vegetative patients who later evolved to clinical MCS suggests that these patients might in fact have been incorrectly categorized as vegetative at the time of the MRI. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to determine whether this technique will provide clinically useful prognostic information.

— Allan S. Brett, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine March 29, 2007

Citation(s):

Di HB et al. Cerebral response to patient's own name in the vegetative and minimally conscious states. Neurology 2007 Mar 20; 68:895-9.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Other Perspectives

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2007. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.