From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

A Controlled Clinical Trial of Steroids for Bronchiolitis

One dose of oral dexamethasone was no different than placebo.

Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of hospitalization among infants in the U.S. Use of steroids for infants with bronchiolitis remains controversial because of the lack of high-quality, sufficiently powered studies. In a multisite double-blind clinical trial, researchers randomized 600 infants (age range, 2–12 months) who presented to an emergency department with no prior history of wheezing and a clinical picture consistent with moderate-to-severe bronchiolitis to receive either a single dose of oral dexamethasone (1 mg/kg) or placebo. The primary outcome was hospitalization 4 hours after drug administration.

The admission rate was virtually identical in the steroid and placebo groups (39.7% and 41.0%, respectively). No differences emerged in subgroup analyses of infants who were positive for respiratory syncytial virus, those younger than 6 months, or those with a history of eczema or family history of asthma. Length of stay for hospitalized infants and subsequent admissions in the 7 days after the intervention were similar in the two groups.

Comment: This likely represents the definitive study of the use of steroids for infants with bronchiolitis in the ambulatory care setting. For infants with no history of wheeze, steroids convey no benefit. These results are consistent with a recent American Academy of Pediatrics guideline, which indicated that corticosteroids should not be used to treat bronchiolitis routinely.

Howard Bauchner, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine July 26, 2007

Citation(s):

Corneli HM et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of dexamethasone for bronchiolitis. N Engl J Med 2007 Jul 26; 357:331-9.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2007. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.