From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Top Story

HYVET Shows Benefits for Treating Hypertension in Healthy Very Old Patients

But, how this finding applies to typical patients outside of studies is unclear.

In most hypertension treatment trials, the focus has been on younger patients; even studies in which the cohort is reported as "elderly" have included patients as young as 60. In the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET; funded by a manufacturer of the study drugs), 3845 generally healthy subjects older than 80 (mean age, 84) with hypertension (mean blood pressure, 171/91 mm Hg) were randomized to the diuretic indapamide (Lozol and generics) or to placebo for 2 years; the angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitor perindopril (Aceon) or a matching placebo could be added, if needed to achieve target BPs (JW Apr 17 2008).

In the indapamide group, systolic BP was lowered by a mean 15 mm Hg, and diastolic BP was lowered by 6 mm Hg. Fatal and nonfatal strokes were somewhat less common in the indapamide group (12.4 vs. 17.7 strokes per 1000 patient-years; P=0.06), with a number needed to treat of 100 to prevent 1 stroke by 2 years. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the indapamide group (10% vs. 12%). Only two serious adverse events occurred, both in the indapamide group.

These results provide encouragement that strokes can be prevented by treating hypertension in very old patients, but the findings probably are too good to be true in general practice. Tightly controlled efficacy trials like this one often yield results that cannot be reproduced in usual practice, because inclusion criteria eliminate many typical patients, and because trial patients benefit from tight monitoring and follow-up that often cannot be reproduced in practice. For example, risk for drug-induced orthostatic hypotension and its potentially serious consequences (e.g., falls, hip fractures) is likely to be much higher in actual practice. Even with careful patient selection and monitoring, the number needed to treat to benefit one patient in the HYVET trial was still quite high. Typical patients who have serious medical comorbidities and take multiple medications are likely to benefit less and to have more adverse events than were those in the HYVET study.

Thomas L. Schwenk, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine December 29, 2008

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2008. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.