From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Spinal Stenosis: Surgical vs. Nonsurgical Therapy

Outcomes with surgery appeared to be superior, but several problematic aspects of this study preclude us from drawing definitive conclusions.

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common cause of radicular leg pain and neurogenic claudication in older adults. In this multicenter U.S. study, investigators compared surgical and nonsurgical care in patients who had experienced at least 12 weeks of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis without degenerative spondylolisthesis.

In a randomized cohort, 289 patients were assigned to surgery or usual care. At 2 years, only 67% of those assigned to surgery actually had undergone surgery, whereas 43% of those assigned to usual care had crossed over to surgery. In an intent-to-treat analysis at 2 years, both groups reported less pain, but the surgery group reported significantly less pain than the usual-care group. Physical function and disability scores did not differ significantly in the two groups.

In addition, 365 patients who refused randomization were enrolled in an observational cohort: 219 initially chose surgery (with 96% proceeding to surgery), and 146 initially chose nonsurgical care (with 22% eventually crossing over to surgery). In an as-treated analysis in which the randomized and observational cohorts were combined and adjusted for potential confounders, mean scores on pain, function, and disability showed significantly more improvement in surgery patients than in usual-care patients through 2 years of follow-up.

Comment: These findings must be regarded as tentative, given the substantial crossover in the intent-to-treat analysis of the randomized portion of the study, and the likely confounding in the as-treated analysis. The authors conclude that surgical outcomes were superior to nonsurgical outcomes. But the study also showed that both surgery and nonsurgery patients improved over time. Thus, patients can be reassured that an initially noninvasive approach, with eventual surgery if symptoms become intolerable, is reasonable. The same issue of the New England Journal of Medicine includes a review article on lumbar spinal stenosis.

Allan S. Brett, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine February 20, 2008

Citation(s):

Weinstein JN et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008 Feb 21; 358:794.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Other Perspectives

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2008. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.