From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Slowing Progression of Atherosclerosis in Diabetic Patients

Pioglitazone outperformed glimepiride in a preliminary trial.

Cardiovascular disease is responsible for 75% of deaths in patients with diabetes, but whether blood sugar control itself lowers this risk is unclear. Researchers addressed that issue in what is purportedly the first head-to-head comparison of a sulfonylurea (an insulin secretagogue) and a thiazolidinedione (an insulin sensitizer); 543 diabetic adults (age range, 35–85) with known coronary artery disease and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels <10% were randomized to daily therapy with the sulfonylurea glimepiride or the thiazolidinedione pioglitazone (Actos). The maker of pioglitazone funded the multicenter study, and its employees were on the research team.

Most patients were taking standard preventive therapies (e.g., aspirin, statins), and patients were permitted to continue other diabetes drugs, such as metformin or insulin. HbA1c levels were roughly 7% for both groups during treatment. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of atherosclerosis was available for 360 subjects (66%) after 18 months of treatment and showed that atheroma volume increased in the glimepiride group and decreased in the pioglitazone group (least square mean change, 0.73% vs. –0.16%; P=0.002). An analysis that included noncompleters showed a similar difference. Hypoglycemia was more common with glimepiride, and edema and fractures were more common with pioglitazone.

Comment: These results suggest that an insulin sensitizer is superior to an insulin secretagogue in lowering risk for heart disease in diabetic patients; however, this trial is limited by the high rate of noncompletion and the researchers’ failure to access actual clinical endpoints. The results certainly justify a larger clinical trial to address these limitations but do not support a change in clinical decision making. Note that in the previously published PROactive trial (Journal Watch Nov 8 2005), pioglitazone was associated with a small decrease in vascular events and a small increase in congestive heart failure among patients who were receiving other antidiabetic therapies.

Thomas L. Schwenk, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine April 1, 2008

Citation(s):

Nissen SE et al. Comparison of pioglitazone vs glimepiride on progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: The PERISCOPE randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008 Apr 2; 299:1561.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Other Perspectives

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2008. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.